Mega Projects Evaluation Criteria: Case Studies from Kuwait Industrial Project

Authors

Keywords:

Mega Projects, Industrial, Policy

Abstract

Mega Urban Regeneration Projects (MURPs) have become key features of regeneration in many cities. Like many large projects, MURPs, because of their complexity and scale, often face the difficulties of being over-budget or late. This research aims to develop and validate a new framework to evaluate mega urban regeneration projects. Four objectives were formulated to address those problems. Firstly, to explore the nexus between MURP, urban transformation, and globalization. Secondly, to identify the characteristics of sustainable mega urban regeneration projects. Thirdly, to investigate existing sustainable urban regeneration frameworks. Fourthly, develop a framework to evaluate Mega Urban Regeneration Projects and, finally, validate the framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Erry Y. T. Adesta, Universitas Putra Indonesia "YPTK"

Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering,
Universitas Putra Indonesia (UPI) YPTK Padang, Indonesia
Department of Manufacturing Engineering,
International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

References

Shah, R.K.J.J.o.A.C.o.E. and Management, An exploration of causes for delay and cost overrun in construction projects: A case study of Australia, Malaysia & Ghana. 2016. 2(1): p. 41-55.

Oyegoke, A.S., N.J.J.o.F.M.o.P. Al Kiyumi, and Construction, The causes, impacts and mitigations of delay in megaprojects in the Sultanate of Oman. 2017.

Le-Hoai, L., Y. Dai Lee, and J.Y.J.K.j.o.c.e. Lee, Delay and cost overruns in Vietnam large construction projects: A comparison with other selected countries. 2008. 12(6): p. 367-377.

Kartam, N., T. Al-Daihani, and J.J.I.J.o. P.M. Al-Bahar, Professional project management practices in Kuwait: issues, difficulties and recommendations. 2000. 18(4): p. 281-296.

Tserng, H.P., et al., A study of ontology-based risk management framework of construction projects through project life cycle. 2009. 18(7): p. 994-1008.

Valipour, A., et al., Identification and evaluation of risk allocation criteria and barriers: a Malaysian public private partnership project case study. 2014. 14(18): p. 2023.

Zhao, X., B.-G. Hwang, and Y.J.J.o. C.P. Gao, A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singapore's green projects. 2016. 115: p. 203-213.

Ika, L.A., A. Diallo, and D.J.I.J.o.M.P.i.B. Thuillier, Project management in the international development industry. 2010.

Fahad Al-Azemi, K., et al., Risk management framework for build, operate and transfer (BOT) projects in Kuwait. 2014. 20(3): p. 415-433.

Toor, S.U.R., S.O.J.C.m. Ogunlana, and economics, Problems causing delays in major construction projects in Thailand. 2008. 26(4): p. 395-408.

Aloini, D., et al., Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature. 2007. 44(6): p. 547-567.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Alrashidi, M. ., & Adesta, E. Y. T. . (2021). Mega Projects Evaluation Criteria: Case Studies from Kuwait Industrial Project . Asian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 1(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://alambiblio.com/ojs/index.php/ajoeee/article/view/4

Issue

Section

Articles